Skip to main content

Evaluating Resources – do you use the CRAAP test? (#23)

Once you have found some information resources you need to check whether they are going to help answer your question. The CRAAP test is a tool to help you to remember what to check for when you are deciding whether to use the information source that you have found. It covers the basics that you need to think about.

Summary of the CRAAP checklist - currency, relevancy, authority, accuracy and purpose
Summary of the CRAAP checklist - currency, relevancy, authority, accuracy and purpose
When you use the CRAAP test you should check the resource you are evaluating for:

  • Currency – is the resource you are looking at recent? Does it contain up-to-date information?
  • Relevancy – is the information relevant to your question. Don’t waste your time looking at irrelevant information
  • Authority – can you tell who has written the information? Who is the publisher or author? Are they qualified on this topic?
  • Accuracy – is the information accurate? Does the argument flow logically? Are there references that you can validate?
  • Purpose – what is the key purpose of the resource? Is it to educate, promote research or to sell you something or collect your data?

If an information resource fails the CRAAP test it doesn’t necessarily mean that it is... well… umm... you know, not very good, just that it is not suitable for your purpose. You don’t want to waste time searching around resources that are not going to help you to answer your question.

You can learn more about the CRAAP text by completing our short etutorial Evaluating Information.

Here is an even shorter video summary:





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Access the big 4 medical journals for free

  Get articles on key, major trials and practice changing news. You can access the big 4 key journals for free. What are the big 4 medical journals? The big 4 medical journals are: BMJ (British Medical Journal) The Lancet NEJM (New England Journal of Medicine) JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association) How do you access the big 4 journals? NHS staff can access all 4 journals online using the same username / password – your NHS OpenAthens username / password. Not sure what an OpenAthens username is? Complete our etutorial. Get your OpenAthens username by completing the online form . Keele University staff and students get automatic access on campus but will need to use their email address and password to log in when off-campus. Where can you access the big 4 journals from? Our journal collections are not necessarily available from the publishers’ websites. NHS staff can browse our journal collections on Browzine. Whereas Keele University staff...

BMJ Case Reports from UHNM staff

 BMJ Case Reports is available to UHNM staff both to view full-text and to submit your own case reports. There have been 2 recent case reports submitted by UHNM staff: Penetrating head trauma unbeknown to the patient David Bristow and Shayda Karimi Abstract Penetrating head trauma often leads to significant morbidity or mortality. A man presented to our tertiary centre with concerns of a nail in his brain after work colleagues reviewed closed-circuit television footage which appeared to show a pneumatic nail gun discharging against his head during an incident at work 4 days earlier. Remarkably, the patient reported no symptoms and no clinical signs apart from a small scabbed area on his scalp. A CT scan of his head was performed which showed a 4 cm nail lodged within the parietal lobe of his brain. The patient subsequently underwent a craniotomy with removal of the nail along with antimicrobial cover with antibiotics and tetanus prophylaxis. The patient made a full recovery and was...

British Journal of Surgery

  The British Journal of Surgery is a surgical specialist journal, publishing a wide range of articles and research across many specialties. What articles does it publish? Here are some articles from a recent issue : Beyond SANO: the future of active surveillance for oesophageal cancer p. znag066 Wang, Jun; Liang, Fei; Pang, Qingsong; … Hui, Zhouguang The morbidity of oesophagectomy and its impact on patient’s quality of life stimulated the search for organ preservation strategies for oesophageal cancer. The Surgery As Needed for Oesophageal cancer (SANO) trial is a multicentre, stepped-wedge, non-inferiority cluster-randomized trial comparing active surveillance (AS) with standard surgery (SUR) in patients with a clinical complete response (cCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy 1 . AS was non-inferior to SUR in terms of overall survival at 2-year follow-up. By randomizing hospitals instead of individual patients and by sequential crossover of centres to the active survei...